We noticed a formatting error which affected readability for some readers. Here’s a corrected version!

___

In a truly collaborative workshop, nothing is sacred. No design is an untouchable masterpiece; the point of coming together is to poke at it, tear it apart, and build it back up, together. No work presented in a workshop setting should be considered a final work of art that is meant to be admired; workshops are for work. If your session doesn’t allow for collaboration and contribution, then a workshop might be the wrong format for your session.

For true and honest collaboration, the facilitator and the participants need to establish trust; primarily, a belief that they and everyone else in the room are there to make the work better, and that everyone’s input actually matters. That’s why a workshop should be structured as a space where people feel safe to disagree, to challenge, and to offer wild new perspectives. The key here is psychological safety: if people are afraid to speak up then creativity and problem-solving just shut down.

I would even argue that the role of the facilitator is to be neutral to the content itself. As a facilitator, you should not have a vested interest in what participants come up with; your role is bring participants toward some outcome that meets the goals of the session. When you are truly objective and neutral as a facilitator, not only do you get more ideas, but you also make magic: when people see their ideas and actions actually shaping the work, they get invested.

When nothing is sacred, participants are more open to participating actively. Presenting work as open for discussion is different from presenting it as something to be re-worked. Inviting people to participate openly in the rethinking of an issue or a solution opens the door to more active participation. That’s why “straw dogs,” “half-baked” ideas and raw data are so useful in workshops. When you give participants something rough to work with, they will jump in with real, actionable feedback. When you present work that is too high fidelity, it can be perceived as “precious” and final. Rough work invites critique and adaptation; it opens the floor to discussion.

In the end, it’s this collective shaping of ideas, where voices are heard and contributions matter that drives projects forward and makes solutions that are useful and usable. So, embrace the mess, invite the critique, and watch your team’s best work take shape!